-4- credit. The effect of credit expansion is the same whether the Government, business, or the ultimate consumer goes into debt. During wars, governments typically go into debt and finance a substantial part of their borrowings through the absorption of Government obligations by the credit system. Recently, consumers, business and the Government have all been increasing their debts, with the result that bank credit has been expanded sharply. If this situation persists, further inflation will be inevitable. Fear of inflation has been intensified currently by the widespread belief mentioned earlier that a Federal Government policy of large spending financed by a deficit and combined with a labor policy which encourages annual wage increases would tend to raise costs and prices even without the excesses of full-scale war. The objective of protection against inflation is, of course, to own assets or earning power which will expand in sympathy with an increase of the general price level and thereby provide the investor or businessman with funds with which to meet the higher cost of living or the higher cost of doing business. The extent to which an asset will provide protection against inflation depends not only on the nature of the asset but also on the price at which it is acquired. Obviously, there is no advantage to be gained in the way of inflation protection through the purchase of an asset which is already fully reflecting the effects of an upward change in the price level. It is also important to consider the question of how serious an inflation is to be expected, for inflation can range all the way from the complete wiping out of currency values, as in Germany after the first World War and as in China in the recent past, to a gradual increase in the price level over a period of several decades. Since 1913, for example, our price level, as measured by cost of living indexes, has risen by 150%. This reflects a substantial increase in the quality and complexity of goods consumed by a typical family, as well as so-called depreciation of the dollar. As the situation now stands, we believe that extreme inflation is likely to develop only as the possible aftermath of another World War. We have said in the discussion above that during another war severe taxation and other restrictions would limit commodity prices, profits and dividends. It is, therefore, quite possible that the first impact of war on stock prices might be deflationary rather than favorable. A more moderate inflation might be induced by the heavy rearmament program, i.e., alternative (3) above, extending for several years. In contemplating this possibility, however, it is well to remember the tremendous productive ability of our industry and the probability that it can support a big armament program and satisfy in large measure our important civilian demands at the same time. Shortages of specific commodities, such as copper, can limit production of some products and cause allocations, but the broad supply of goods seems to be sufficiently ample to represent an effective brake to runaway prices unless the Government, business and consumers act with complete recklessness in anticipating their needs. A discussion of curbs to higher prices would not be complete without reference to our price support program for farm products which a few months ago was in danger of breakdown due to accumulation of surpluses and was becoming politically untenable due to high cost. Although surpluses are viewed more favorably at the moment, a relaxation of war fears, as discussed in alternative (2), could make agriculture once more a serious source of deflationary pressure. |