-2- Nationality was a basic factor to be reckoned with. What were Germany's relations with Eastern European nations going to be? If Germany chose the right method - for it was a question of method and he understood that national socialism recognised the right of all nationalities to independence British public opinion would be reassured and confidence would be stabilised. Mr. Eden had shown that British vital interests did not lie in this sphere. At Leamington for the first time an attempt had been made to re-define British policy in terms of reality. In that speech the Foreign Secretary with the approval of the Cabinet had defined the points for which Great Britain would So to war and a definition of these vital Interests was regarded an important contribution to peace. They were: (1) The Integrity of the British Empire. (2) The security of France and Belgium against unprovoked aggression. (5) Egypt - the Sues Canal. (4) Irak. If a serious crisis did happen In Eastern Europe, declared Lothian, it was a matter of how British public opinion would react, It would depend on the circumstances. But if Germany could convince British public opinion that It has no intention of destroying the independence of other non-German races in Eastern xxxxxx the situation would be immensely simplified, especially if Gemany protested the Eastern States against the growing power of Russia. Lord Lothian drew the analogy of the relation between England and the Dominions, U.S.A. and the South American States In which the principle of nationality was recognised as the necessary basis for organisation. Secondly there was the colonial questLenin stated Lord Lothian. Territorial change was a formidable problem, always the most difficult. It affects the national pride and the vested interests which have grown up, England recognises that |