-3- #3278, March 29, 9 p.m., from London
 
 
boundaries for those parts, and what interrelationship to exist among
the parts; (sub two) at what time division should be carried out; (sub
three) what measures the Allies would have to take in order to
effectuate and maintain such division.  two.  Inquiries of the
Committee along lines set forth under (C) above will be conducted in
the light of subjects set forth in paragraphs (A) and (B).  END OF
PARAPHRASE
 
 
I objected to paragraph one B of this draft, asking that intead of the
words "destruction and control of German industry" we substituted the
words "elimination or control of all German industry that could be used
for military production" as set forth in the Yalta communique.  Strang
accepted this change and Gousev said he had no objection to it.  I have
written Mr. Eden to say that with this modification I have no objection
to Strang's draft.
 
 
In reply to Strang's letter of March 9 Gousev has now written Mr. Eden,
setting forth his understanding of the Mandate of the Committee and
stating that he has no objection to the formula contained in Strang's
draft.  Beginning of paraphrase of Gousev's statement submitted as "a
proposal