-7- on the attitude. It seems to me, though a slight affair, as significant as anything in my experience while in Germany. I was dining with an old friend, a professor in the University of Berlin. There were present his wife, a friend of hers who is the daughter of one of the most distinguished Jewish scientists of thirty years ago (the only 'non-Aryan'), a pupil of my friend now an assistant to him, and a pleasant, intelligent medical professor from a provincial university whom I had never seen before. After some general conversation about conditions in the United States which was not without personal significance because one daughter of the Jewess is already in America and another expects to go to America soon, the medical professor said to me something like this, "About 1910 when as an assistant I first began to see American medical men, we found it necessary to make great allowances for them because although they were good fellows their education and training had obviously been defective and they were clearly behind the best Europeans of the same age. Today we look to America as leading the world in medical science. How has such progress been possible in a quarter of a century? How far has it been due to pouring out money?" It was quite apparent that his question was really the expression of a hope that something like this might some day be possible in Germany. To this question I replied about as follows: "We have indeed made great progress in America, but nothing like what your question implies. You are largely in error for two reasons: (1) You and practically all Germans greatly underestimated the achievements of American science 25 years ago. (2) Today you considerably overestimate our achievements and our present merits. In short, you arrive at far too great an estimate of our progress by subtracting a quantity that is much too small from a quantity that is much |