balances by about $100 million a year, and by $200 million
if India and Australia join in.
6. The British argue that some growth of their reserves is
indispensable to the delicate system they are operating by which
they finance the war on credit throughout a large part of the
world, and that the retention of some part of the above receipts,
as a support to this credit system and an offset to a much larger
increase of liabilities, is not open to legitimate criticism.
They point out that the Russians are believed to hold gold reserves
nearly double the total reserves of the British and have no significant
liabilities against them. But, in the case of Russia, it is not
at present proposed to require them to surrender any part of
their reserves as a condition of further Lend-Lease assist
7. The British feel that they ought not to be aspect to agree
to ceiling to their balances, since their reserve position must
be their own concern, nevertheless, if the British argument is
accepted as valid, the position could be regularized by a new
Directive, which would set up a revised formula for the guidance
American Departments. If the figure given by the new formula
was being approached, then the whole question could be re-o
8. The new formula might provide that an increase in British
reserves is not unreasonable if the increase does not exceed,
say, 30 per cent, of the in-crease of British liabilitie
9. Figures furnished to Congress hitherto have not disclosed
the full burden of British overseas liabilities, or their rate
of growth. It might necessary to justify the new arrangement
to provide that the information given to Congress in future should
be fuller, and should show in some fashion, which would, not
be dangerous to British credit, the growth of liabilities as
well as the growth of reserves.
26th October, 1943