-4- of war weapons, manned by skilled mechanics ad stouthearted freemen, as we shall loose in 1943 and 1944 against the Axis. In some few sectors, we have already taken the offensive, moths ahead of our original plans. That offensive will rise in irresistible crescendo, more and more rapidly, more and more powerfully, until totalitarianism, with its menace to religion and freedom, is finally and utterly crushed. The Axis knows this, kmows that its ill-gotten gains cannot be held by continuing the war. What they won through treacherous war, they may now try to retain by a treacherous peace. They timed this war to begin when they were at the zenith of their strength, and when the freedom and peace-loving nations were unprepared. Their plans have miscarried; now, we have reason to believe, they are casting about for someone to make a peace proposal which will enable them to escape the inexorable results of defeat in the field. It is the first sign of a break in Nazi confidence: their peace offensive is a confession of weakness. We Americans are new at world politics. Our geographical position in the past isolated us from Europe and the other continents. Modern communications have forced us from our isolation into world affairs. We are learning. One of the first lessons we have grasped is this: that cunninly timed and craftily planned peace proposals may be used by faithless aggressors as instruments of war. A peace move may be a snare; for the Nazis, it has always been a part of military strategy. Their record in Austria, Czechoslovakia, Poland and elsewhere is too recent to be forgotten. Japan talked peace to us at Washington whie she was preparing and consumating the treachery of Pearl Harbor. Thus world experience of Axis "peace" has been bitter. In our case it has also been salutary. Since the Nazis, conscious of their waning power, are likely to be searching for an intermediary to put forth peace-fellers, it is well that those whom we trust should know in advance the position of the United States Government on any tentative proposal from such a source: We shall not be led away from principle by any stop-gap peace. Our Christian ideals, as well as our national existence, would be in jeopardy if we consented to forego now our manifest advantages. An indesisive peace would be a partial victory foe the Axis, and would lead later to a resumption of the conflict under conditions which might be diadavntageous to us and what we stand for. We want none of it. We will have nothing of an armed truce which would be a breathing space for the enemies of Christian civilization. We will not permist Axis grand strategy, which includes in its arsenal the hypocrisy of false peace, to hold the initiative in the conduct of this war. We have determined that we cannot deal with the faithless men; that the peaceful ways of diplomacy hav utterly failed against Axis duplicity, |