-2- contrary to the intent of the Act. The military importance that is being attached to helium at the present time is out of proportion to its known military value. Helium in itself is not a weapon but is merely a commodity that possesses certain value when used in connection with certain types of aircraft. In this respect, it is comparable to other commodities such as gasoline when used in connection with bombardment airplanes or tanks. The only known military use for helium is for the inflation of lighter-than-air craft. The military value of such craft, other than possibly that of captive observation balloons, has never been established either in this country or abroad. On the other hand, the military value of heavier-than-air craft has been definitely established. The ever increasing efficiency and wide ranges of use of the latter are causing them to supplant all other means for aerial operations. The War Department has definitely abandoned the idea of employing airships in military operations and the current trend is away from the use of captive observation balloons as recent developments in heavier-than-air craft indicate that such craft may soon be far superior to balloons for observation purposes. The diminishing military value of helium is evident. In so far as the use of helium is concerned, it must be remembered that the gas does not remain constant in quantity, but, when used to inflate airships or balloons, must be frequently replenished. To assure the continuous operation of these craft, reserve supplies of the gas must be maintained and made available to the craft after each flight. The amount of loss and wastage can be determined for each type of such craft and reserve suppiles of the gas provided for accordingly. If helium is to be used in time of war for the inflation of airships, large reserves of the gas must be built up in time of peace. From information now available to the War Department, adequate natural reserves of the gas exist only in the United States. For a nation to build a military program dependent upon a commodity not natural to it or readily available to it in time of war would be contrary to all known military practices. While hydrogen is highly inflammable and craft inflated with it face the constant danger of destruction by fire, its greater buoyancy gives a craft added lifting power and greater maneuverability. Even though helium is non-inflammable, it is still debatable as to which of the two gases possesses the greater value for mllitary operations. Regardless of the inflating agent, however, lighter-than-air craft are highly vulnerable to gun fire and their destruction is a comparatively easy accomplishment. The mere fact that such a craft might be inflated with non-inflammable helium is no guarantee against its loss. |