REPARATION AND RESTITUTION POLICY TOWARD GERMANY Summary 1. Nature of American Interest. A mistaken reparation policy may not only have adverse effects on the future economic stability of Europe but may jeopardize the political and economic objectives of this country with respect to Germany. For this reason German reparation should be supported only to the extent that it does not conflict with more important objectives. 2. Policy Recommendation. a) Reparation should consist of the entire surplus above the output needed to maintain a minimum prescribed standard of living and to pay for relief, occupation costs and other prior charges. It should be made clear that the U.S. will not finance the transfer of reparation either directly or indirectly. b) To minimize interference with normal trade the reparation period should be short; if possible five years, and in any event not over ten. c) Reparation should be payable predominantly "in kind." Labor services within reasonable limits should not be opposed provided a distinction is made in the treatment accorded to formerly active Nazis and politically passive Germans, respectively. d) The principal basis of apportionment should be damage to non-military property exclusive of current output. A supplementary basis, admissible only at a lower weighting, should be occupation costs. The reparation settlement should be con- sidered as clearing finally all claims against Germany arising out of the war. e) Germany should be obliged to restitute all identi- fiable stolen property. Gold and unique objects (but not other property) should be replaced with equivalents from German stocks if lost or destroyed. f) United Nation should have the option of retaining and disposing of German property within their territories, the proceeds to be applied against reparation claims. |