November 8, 1930. RENGENESCHI v. ROOSEVELT Dear Governor Roosevelt: At the suggestion of Mr. O'Connor, I communicated with Henry T. Hackett of Poughkeepsie relative to the accident which resulted in the destruction of your Ford Cabriolet. The only information I got from Mr. Hackett was that contained in a letter addressed by him to you under date of October 8th, a copy of which he mailed to me. I then endeavored to get in touch with Mr. Rosenman for further information but was advised that he is taking a cruise. I am therefore compelled to trouble you for further information regarding the accident. After looking up the law quite carefully, I feel that there is a fair chance of having the action removed from New York County to Dutchess County. I think that I should consult the insurance company, however, as to whether their legal staff will attend to the removal or whether we can assist them. Although Mr. Hackett is suggesting the engagement of Edward A. Conger to represent you in case the controversy is litigated in Dutchess County, I assume that in view of the fact that you are now the defendant and are covered by insurance you will let the insurance company bear the burden and trouble of litigating the matter. Although the insurance company ordinarily is not obligated to endeavor to collect for you on any claim which you may have against the driver of the other car, nevertheless I am sure that they will be willing to incorporate a counterclaim in the answer which you have to file in the above action, in which counterclaim adequate damages will be demanded for the destruction of the Ford Cabriolet. If you will give me the name of the insurance company, I shall be glad to get in touch with their representative immediately, turn over to him the summons which was served on you, and collaborate with him in the matter of removing the action to Dutchess County and seeing to it that a proper counterclaim is interposed. Faithfully yours, Arnold T. Koch |