4
voice being the unison of many"-- the intention being
to get more voices in the "unison." One exponent of the
plan has said:
"Complete coordination of. foreign policies is
perhaps too much to expect. But the British Gov-
ernment should cultivate the habit of consulting
as regularly with Paris, Brussels, the Hague,
Copenhagen and Oslo as it already does with Ottawa,
Canberra, Wellington and Pretoria. And in the one
case as in the other such consultation will almost
always result in an agreed policy."
In addition to establishing a common foreign policy
it has been pointed out by those favoring the plan that
in the field of strategy the war has shown how many other
different forms of collaboration it is possible to achieve
without an official statement of sovereignty. They cite
the Combined Chiefs of Staff now linking the American and
British Forces as an example, and state that something
like it might be reproduced in a more permanent form to
insure the strategic unity of Western Europe. They also
note the Combined Boards -- each dealing Jointly with a
specific problem - finance, transport, supplies, produc-
tion, resources, raw materiels, etc. They point out too
that types of weapons might be standardized, as could
instruction in staff colleges -- thereby building up a
"staff mind".
The possibilities of collaboration in the economic
field are discussed in more vague terms -- most probably
because considerable opposition would doubtless develop
both at home and abroad. The potentialities, however, are
great. A customs union is suggested -- presumably an ex-
tension of Imperial Preference -- and one author states:
"The creation of such a union- a unified
market of 115,000,000 people not counting any
of their colonial dependencies - would be an
immense benefit to its members and to the world
at large."
Currency agreements are spoken of, and civil aviation is
cited as a field in which the countries have a community
of interest.