4 voice being the unison of many"-- the intention being to get more voices in the "unison." One exponent of the plan has said: "Complete coordination of. foreign policies is perhaps too much to expect. But the British Gov- ernment should cultivate the habit of consulting as regularly with Paris, Brussels, the Hague, Copenhagen and Oslo as it already does with Ottawa, Canberra, Wellington and Pretoria. And in the one case as in the other such consultation will almost always result in an agreed policy." In addition to establishing a common foreign policy it has been pointed out by those favoring the plan that in the field of strategy the war has shown how many other different forms of collaboration it is possible to achieve without an official statement of sovereignty. They cite the Combined Chiefs of Staff now linking the American and British Forces as an example, and state that something like it might be reproduced in a more permanent form to insure the strategic unity of Western Europe. They also note the Combined Boards -- each dealing Jointly with a specific problem - finance, transport, supplies, produc- tion, resources, raw materiels, etc. They point out too that types of weapons might be standardized, as could instruction in staff colleges -- thereby building up a "staff mind". The possibilities of collaboration in the economic field are discussed in more vague terms -- most probably because considerable opposition would doubtless develop both at home and abroad. The potentialities, however, are great. A customs union is suggested -- presumably an ex- tension of Imperial Preference -- and one author states: "The creation of such a union- a unified market of 115,000,000 people not counting any of their colonial dependencies - would be an immense benefit to its members and to the world at large." Currency agreements are spoken of, and civil aviation is cited as a field in which the countries have a community of interest. |