- 5 -
recognised that democracy and free institutions begin to develop
from below under conditions of peace and security and tend to
decline where war or revolution are constant. An important by-product
of the control of the seas by Great Britain in the past has been
the growth of freedom and democracy behind the shield of British
sea power. Not only has Great Britain steadily become more democratic
in the last century, but Canada, Australia, South Africa and
New Oealand have become in effect independent nations, and self-government
has been rapidly developed recently in India, Ceylon, Burma and
among all peoples of the British Commonwealth who are ready for
it. This is due to no special virtue among the British people.
It is partly due to the fact that Great Britain has long been
a satisfied and prosperous power. It is far more due to the fact
that the stable peace and security created by the control of
the seas by an increasingly liberal Britain made possible an
uninterrupted pressure for freedom and self-government from below
both in Great Britain itself and in all its possessions. The
control of the seas by Great Britain has also been the first
line of defence behind which North and South America have enjoyed
the unusual advantage of being able to develop along their own
lines without having to engage in international struggles and
war for more than a century before 1914. The virtue of the system
is seen in the fact that the nineteenth century saw the greatest
expansion of freedom all over the non-European and non-Asiatic
world ever recorded and that during that period there was no
world war, until British sea-power was once more challenged in
1914.
It is this system which is now under attack. The basis of
the British control of the seas was twofold:
(a) The policy of the balance of power in Europe, which sought
to prevent any authoritarian or militarist power from obtaining
control over