- 5 - recognised that democracy and free institutions begin to develop from below under conditions of peace and security and tend to decline where war or revolution are constant. An important by-product of the control of the seas by Great Britain in the past has been the growth of freedom and democracy behind the shield of British sea power. Not only has Great Britain steadily become more democratic in the last century, but Canada, Australia, South Africa and New Oealand have become in effect independent nations, and self-government has been rapidly developed recently in India, Ceylon, Burma and among all peoples of the British Commonwealth who are ready for it. This is due to no special virtue among the British people. It is partly due to the fact that Great Britain has long been a satisfied and prosperous power. It is far more due to the fact that the stable peace and security created by the control of the seas by an increasingly liberal Britain made possible an uninterrupted pressure for freedom and self-government from below both in Great Britain itself and in all its possessions. The control of the seas by Great Britain has also been the first line of defence behind which North and South America have enjoyed the unusual advantage of being able to develop along their own lines without having to engage in international struggles and war for more than a century before 1914. The virtue of the system is seen in the fact that the nineteenth century saw the greatest expansion of freedom all over the non-European and non-Asiatic world ever recorded and that during that period there was no world war, until British sea-power was once more challenged in 1914. It is this system which is now under attack. The basis of the British control of the seas was twofold: (a) The policy of the balance of power in Europe, which sought to prevent any authoritarian or militarist power from obtaining control over |