- 5 - would be required to consent to the dissolution as part of the terms of the peace settlement. It can be assumed that now, since recognition of the provisional govern- ment. France is in a position and would be disposed to consent to dissolution. The status of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania is doubtful, and it seems likely that they will not be in a position to assert any interest which they may have in this problem. This leaves only the following "neutral" states: Aghanistan, Argentina, Denmark, Eire, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland, and Turkey. The possibility that one or more of these states might adopt an intransigent atti- tude cannot entirely be ignored. If this should occur the principal practical effect would be a possible delay of the transfer of proper by rights. The possible number of recalcitrant, states is too small and their position acting separately too weak seriously to impede the proposed procedure. Presumably, virtually all of them when given an opportunity will join the new organization, and acquiesce in the liquidation of the League. If it were planned to proceed by means of such a protocol, it would appear that appropriate provision might have to be made in the basic instrument of the new organization authorizing the acceptance of the prop- erties, powers and functions so tendered, and arranging for proper transitory measures, subject to subsequent assignment by the Organization to its appropriate organs. (2) Protocol of Transfer Simultaneously with the opening for signature of the protocol of dissolution and transfer, there might be opened for signature by all states with the appropriate interest a protocol to the following effect: 1. In all treaties or other engagements, excepting the Statute of the Permanent Court of Interna- tional Justice, to which the signatories are parties or in which they have or claim an interest, vesting any rights, powers, authority, or functions in the League of Nations, the new organization |